Sunday, 21 February 2016
Thursday, 18 February 2016
Evaluation Question 4
- How did
you use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and
evaluation stages?
Camcorder (Panasonic HD camera) – My groups used this camcorder from college to film our music
video. It was useful as it was easy to
transfer the files from the camcorder to the computer. However, sometimes we
couldn’t find the files that we had filmed and we had to re-film those shots
again. Another disadvantage we had was we struggled to get clear shots when it
was dark. Because of the time of year (autumn/winter), the weather was cold and
dull and we didn't have many daylight hours to film. To overcome this for one
scene, we tried to use the flash off our phones to help the camera pick up the
actors faces. In future, I would find a more advanced camera to film a video so
the image quality is better and we would have more options of when in the day
we could film.
Canon EOS 700D Camera- For the photoshoots for my print
products I used my Canon camera. At the time this camera was new to me so this
meant I was still learning how to use the settings of the camera. However, the
camera was simple enough to use and allowed me to receive clear photographs for
my work. In addition to this it was easy to get access to the photographs on
the computer as I only had to remove the SD card from the camera and transfer
it into the computer.
Adobe Premier Pro – There were advantages and disadvantages
to using this software. A disadvantage was the software kept crashing so
unsaved work would be lost. To overcome this we had to save our work every
couple of minutes. However this meant that we lost valuable time during the
editing period as we had to wait for the software to work. Furthermore, the
college decided to update all the adobe software half way through our project.
This meant we lost even more time as we had to convert the files to work on the
new software and had to relearn how to use the new software. As none of the
members of our group had experience with this software we had to teach
ourselves how to use it through a lot of trial and error. An advantage from the
update was that the software worked faster and crashed less. We also had access
to the software on the college computers at all times during college hours. Another
advantage would be the wide variety of choice of filters to edit our video
with. This was helpful as it allowed us to choose filters with colours that
link in with our genre.
Adobe Photoshop - To create my print work products I used
Adobe Photoshop for my editing software. As I also take photography classes at
college I already had some knowledge of how to use this programme. The
programme worked really well for me as it wasn't too difficult to use and had
many options to choose from when editing your work. Also this programme rarely
lagged or crashed compared to Adobe Premier Pro. The only problems that I experienced with this
programme is that when I tried to work on my products at home, elements such as
fonts would be missing so I would have to start over on some parts. This meant
I got behind on work as I could only edit my work properly during college
hours. Another problem I found was that
not all the computers at college at the same version of photoshop. This meant
that when I worked on an older version of Photoshop, I was unable to edit some
parts of the programme which meant I lost out on time.
Blogger – Blogger was useful to use at it helped keep a
record of the research I had done in one place. Blogger is also simple to use. It was helpful when working with a group during research as it allowed us to see what
each of us had researched and how much work each of us had done collectively.
As blogger was is an online site, it meant that my work was safe and wouldn't
get lost. It also let me present my work neatly and keep it all in one place.
YouTube - I used YouTube quite regularly during this
product. I used it at the start to find and research existing videos that are
the same genre as ours. I did this to get an idea of what conventions are
important to use and what reoccurring storylines there are. As a group we also
used YouTube to upload our videos of feedback, test shots, animatic and the
music video itself so we could easily put our videos onto our blogs. YouTube
was easy enough to use to upload videos and it didn't take long to do so
either.
Prezi - Prezi is a
presentation website which allows you to create presentations. This was useful
as it allowed us to neatly organize my research and planning for my products.
In addition to this, Prezi allows more than one persona time to edit a Prezi meaning as a group we could all work together on some
pieces such as our pitch idea. The only negative which I experience with Prezi
was that occasionally the programme would crash and if my work hadn't
automatically saved then the work which I had done would be lost.
Powtoon - Powtoon is a presentation software which is
similar to the likes of Powerpoint but it's animated and the end product is a
video. Once you have mastered how to use the basics of Powtoon then the
programme is easy to use. however I found that I was writing big blocks of text
on this website making my presentation for evaluations, research etc seem
boring and unreadable.
Smartphones (Samsung Galaxy S4) - During the creation of our
products, we kept in contact via our phones. This was helpful as we could keep
in touch with each other and organise when and where to film, finding out when
actors where available, and to carry on planning and organising our work even
when we were at home. To do this we used
the internet (Web 2.0) and used social media such as Facebook. Our group
created a group chat on Facebook which was easy. In addition to this, I used
Facebook to get some audience feedback for my print work. I did this by
creating a page and asking questions for members to answer. This was effective
as everyone could answer the questions in their own time. A disadvantage to
this was that not everyone answered the questions in time.
(This question was originally filmed and edited. Unfortunately the file has gone weird and I have ran out of time to start over).
Wednesday, 10 February 2016
Tuesday, 9 February 2016
Monday, 1 February 2016
Wednesday, 20 January 2016
Audience Feedback
To get some audience feedback for my print work so far, I decided to create a Facebook group because it was an easy way to get people to respond when they are available.
After this I added a couple of people to the group and told them what the group is about and what they needed to do (if they wanted to take part).
I then posted my work so far onto the page along with five questions.
After this I added a couple of people to the group and told them what the group is about and what they needed to do (if they wanted to take part).
I then posted my work so far onto the page along with five questions.
Here is my first audience response -
This response is very useful and I'm definitely going to take some of these points into consideration. I need to make sure all the text is readable and the fonts are similar to each other. I am also going to try and find a different font for the band name to make it more Indie/Rock like.
This response is also very helpful. I think I'm going to re think what photography I'm going to use for my booklet to make sure there is a strong sense of continuity.
Katie's feedback has also given me more ideas on how to complete and improve my print work.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




